Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8413 (GAU)

MONI DEVI v. THE UNION OF INDIA

I.A.(Civil)/1572/2026 · 2026-06-16

Mridul Kumar Kalita

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010094502026 2026:GAU-AS:8759 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1572/2026 MONI DEVI W/O LT. KUMUD NATH, R/O VILL- MEKANAR CHUBURI, P.S- BIHAGURI, DIST- SONITPUR, ASSAM VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE GENERAL MANAGER, NORTH EASTERN RAILWAY Advocate for the Petitioner : MR M AHMED, A. K. KANU,MR A. ALI,N. CHOUDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., MR. B DEKA (R-1) In Case : CRP/53/2026 SMTI MONI DEVI W/O LT. KUMUD NATH R/O VILL- MEKANAR CHUBURI P.S- BIHAGURI DIST- SONITPUR ASSAM VERSUS Page No.# 2/3 UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE GENERAL MANAGER NORTH EASTERN RAILWAY ------------ Advocate for : MR M AHMED Advocate for : DY.S.G.I. appearing for UNION OF INDIA With CRP Case No. 53/2026 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER 17.06.2026 [1] Heard Mr. M. Ahmed, the learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Ms. A. Jain, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. B. Deka, the learned Central Government Counsel. [2] This interlocutory application has been filed by the applicant praying for amendment of the civil revision petition filed by the present applicant in CRP No. 53/2026. [3] The prayer is not objected to by the learned counsel for the respondent’s side. [4] Hence, same is allowed. [5] The applicant is directed to file the amended revision petition within a week from the date of this order. [6] This interlocutory application is, accordingly Page No.# 3/3 disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant