Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8412 (CAL)

MD. SAKIM v. BALLY MUNICIPALITY AND ORS.

WPA/1039/2026 · 2026-04-13

Shampa Dutt Paul

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

13.04.2026 Item No.17 Ct. No. 30 Aloke WPA 1039 of 2026 Md. Sakim Vs. Bally Municipality & Ors. Mr. Neil Basu Mr. Sankha Biswas Mr. Avidipta Paul ..for the petitioner 1. Affidavit-of-service filed be kept with the record. 2. The writ application has been preferred praying for direction upon the respondent/Municipality to demolish the illegal and unauthorized construction made by the private respondents. 3. It is submitted that in spite of filing several representations, the last being on 06.09.2025, the respondent authorities are not taking any action nor considering the petitioner’s representation. 4. On hearing the learned counsels for the parties, the writ application is disposed of with the direction that the respondent no. 2 shall consider the petitioner’s representation dated 06.09.2025 on hearing all the stake holders and decide the issue by passing a reasoned order, in accordance with law, within 60 days from the date of this order. 5. WPA 1039 of 2026 stands disposed of. 8. Connected application, if any, stands disposed of. 2 9. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Shampa Dutt (Paul), J.)