1 2026:CGHC:16609 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3183 of 2026 1. Dev Kumar Chandra S/o Shri Dilip Kumar Chandra Aged About 52 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Primary School Jahrna, Block- Bamhnidih, District- Janjgir- Champa (CG) ... Petitioner versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (CG) 2. Director Of Public Instruction Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (CG) 3. Joint Director Education Division, Bilaspur,, District- Bilaspur (CG) 4. District Education Officer District- Janjgir- Champa (CG) 5. Block Education Officer Block- Bamhnidih, District- Janjgir- Champa (CG) 6. Collector District- Janjgir- Champa (CG) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Jeet Ram Patel, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Avinash Singh, Panel Lawyer S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 10/04/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1.That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to consider and decide the petitioner’s representations (ANNEXURE - P/3), regarding payment of remaining salary (i.e. 50% salary) of the petitioner for the suspension SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI Digitally signed by SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI Date: 2026.04.10 18:35:17 +0530 2 period from 10.6.2022 to 01.12.2022, after adjusting the subsistence allowance, with interest, within stipulated time, in the interest of justice. 10.2. That, any other relief which the Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper also be granted to the petitioner, in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that as of now, petitioner is not pressing this writ petition on merits and only seeking a direction to respondent No.4 to consider and take decision on representation submitted by petitioner on 28.10.2025 at the earliest within specified time. 3. Learned Panel Lawyer appearing on behalf of respondents would submit that in view of limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, he is not having any objection. 4. Heard learned counsel for respective parties and perused the documents annexed along with writ petition. 5. Considering the facts and circumstance of case, nature of grievance raised and submission of learned counsel for respective parties, this writ petition at this stage is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.4 to take decision on pending representation of petitioner dated 28.10.2005 in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the order. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge roshan/-