09.26FCA 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 901 FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.9 OF 2026 VIVEK RAMAKANT BHURKAPALLE VERSUS SMITA VIVEK BHURKAPALLE @ SWATI SONYABAPU CHAME ... Advocate for Appellant : Mr.S.V.Gundre ... WITH FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 8 OF 2026 … SMITA VIVEK BHURKAPALLE @ SWATI SONYABAPU CHAME VERSUS VIVEK RAMAKANT BHURKAPALLE ... Advocate for the Appellant : Mr.A.B.Bhuse h/f. Mr.K.P.Rodge ... CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ. DATE : 10.09.2026 P.C. : 1] Vide order dated 9th September, 2026, the compromise terms filed by the rival parties were sent to the Registrar [Judicial] of this Court for verification. The report of the Registrar [Judicial] dated 09.09.2026 is received. On going through the said report, it appears that the parties had 2026:BHC-AUG:42231-DB 09.26FCA 2 voluntarily entered into those compromise terms and they were duly identified by their respective counsel. 2] In view of the same, the consent terms are accepted. Decree be drawn in terms of compromise. Family Court Appeal No.9 of 2026 is accordingly disposed of. 3] In view of disposal of FCA No. 9 of 2026, nothing survives in another Appeal i.e. Family Court Appeal No.8 of 2026 and the same also stands disposed of. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE] JUDGE JUDGE DDC