Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8322-DB WA No. 169 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH WRIT APPEAL NO. 169 OF 2026 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN:
1. NARAYANAMMA W/O CHIKKAVEERA NAGAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
2. SIDDAPPA S/O CHIKKAVEERA NAGAPPA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
3. NAGENDRA S/O CHIKKAVEERA NAGAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
4. SRIKANTH S/O CHIKKAVEERA NAGAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
5. MUNIRAJU S/O CHIKKAVEERA NAGAPPA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
ALL ARE R/AT BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK, BENGALURU-560049. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR C., ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by VASANTHA KUMARY B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8322-DB WA No. 169 of 2026
AND:
1. CHANDRAPPA S/O GIRIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS R/O HOUSE LIST NO.86, HIRANDAHALLI VILLAGE, BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK, BENGALURU-560049
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT BENGALURU-560001.
3.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH SUB DIVISION, BENGALURU-560001.
4.
THE TAHSILDAR BENGALURU EAST TALUK, K.R. PURAM, BENGALURU-560036.
5.
THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, BENGALURU-560049.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN WP No. 13114/2019 (KLR-RR/SUR) ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND SET ASIDE THE
JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 08.12.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN WP No. 13114/2019 (KLR-RR/SUR) AND CONSEQUENTLY, UPHELD THE ORDER DATED 15.02.2019 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT No. 1 IN RP No. 75/2015-16, ETC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8322-DB WA No. 169 of 2026
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)
After some arguments, Sri Chandrashekar C., learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants would like to withdraw the appeal with liberty to pursue the remedy as may be available to them in law.
2. Considering the aforesaid submission, we dismiss the writ appeal reserving liberty as prayed for.
SD/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE
SD/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE
NG List No.: 2 Sl No.: 12