APHC010429652026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY, THE 20th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 23305/2026 Between: 1. TAMBELA VENUGOPAL REDDY, S/O. RAMIREDDY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O. KOTHAPALLI VILLAGE, MANDARAM GP, RAJAMPET MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY IT'S PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, (REVENUE) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, -522238 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. - 516001 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, RAJAMPET REVENUE DIVISION, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. -516001 4. THE TAHSILDAR, RAJAMPET MANDAL, RAJAMPET, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. -516001 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MANNUR PS, RAJAMPET YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.-516001 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WR/T OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in interfering with the petitioner agricultural property and also taking steps to alter the revenue records to an extent of Ac. 2.47 cents out of Ac. 3.47 cents in Sy.No. 142 situated in Sitarampuram revenue Village, Rajampet Mandal, YSR Kadapa District without following the due procedure contemplated under the ROR Act, is illegal, arbitrary and Violative of Article 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner private property and not to alter the revenue records of the petitioner without following the due process of law to an extent of Ac. 2.47 cents out of Ac. 3.47 cents in Sy.No. 142 situated in Sitarampuram revenue Village, Rajampet Mandal, YSR Kadapa District IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner private property and not to alter the revenue records of the petitioner without following the due process of law to an extent of Ac. 2.47 cents out of Ac. 3.47 cents in Sy.No. 142 situated in Sitarampuram revenue Village, Rajampet Mandal, YSR Kadapa District Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NAVULURU KRISHNA SAI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER Heard Sri Navuluru Krishna Sai, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Divya Teja, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents 1 to 4 and Sri Mallikarjun, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the 5th respondent. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the 4th respondent is attempting to dispossess the petitioner from an extent of Ac.2.47 cents, out of Ac.3.47 cents in S.No.142 in Sitarampuram Revenue Village, Rajampet Mandal, YSR Kadapa District, without following due procedure. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner purchased an extent of Ac.2.47 cents in S.No.142 under a registered sale deed dated 27.09.2012. The petitioner also purchased another extent of Ac.1.00 cents of land in S.No.142 under a different document. The name of the petitioner was updated in the Records of Rights, and the revenue authorities issued a pattadar pass book (Ex.P3) in the name of the petitioner. Be that as it may, without issuing any notice, the 4th respondent is attempting to dispossess the petitioners from the property referred to supra. 4. Sri Divya Teja, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue submitted the written instructions of the 4th respondent-Tahsildar, and he would submit that the 4th respondent will follow due procedure if they require the said land. 5. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, keeping the writ petition pending and inviting a counter will not serve any purpose. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage with the consent of learned counsel on either side, directing the 4th respondent not to interfere with an extent of Ac.2.47 cents in S.No.142 in Sitarampuram Revenue Village, Rajampet Mandal, YSR Kadapa District, without following due procedure. No order as to costs. It is made clear that this Court has not recorded any finding concerning the title of the petitioner, in respect of the subject land. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI PVD