Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8402 (JHR)

MUKESH KASERA v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3446/2026 · 2026-05-05

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:13277 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3446 of 2026 ------ Mukesh Kasera, aged about 44 years, Son of Sri Kishun Prasad Kasera, resident of Village Moktama, P.O. – Kariyathpur & P.S. –Ichak, District –Hazaribag, State – Jharkhand. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kr. Mishra, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.03 Dated- 05.05.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Ramgarh P.S. Case No. 11 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 310(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed dacoity and looted valuables from the Dayal Steel. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that though the petitioner is not named in the FIR but without putting him under T.I. Parade, as mentioned in para-03 of the supplementary affidavit dated 28.04.2026, charge sheet has been submitted against him in this case. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 22.01.2026 as mentioned in para-01 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-10 of the instant bail application. It is then submitted that the co- accused person has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 16.04.2026 in B.A. No. 3001 of 2026. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M, Ramgarh in connection with Ramgarh P.S. Case No. 11 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 05.05.2026 Sonu/