[2026:RJ-JP:22438] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7229/2026 Dhanraj S/o Ambalal, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Gavdi, P.s. Nainwa, District Bundi (Raj.) (At Present In J.c. At Sub Jail, Nainwa District Bundi). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Majhar Hussain Mr. Wasim Akram Ms. Shahin Bano For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 26/05/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.17/2026 registered at Police Station Nainwa, District Bundi for offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 189(2) and 109(1) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He again submits that in the present matter, a cross-FIR has been registered by the petitioner, Dhanraj, against the complainant side with respect to the same incident, in which he also sustained injuries. The injuries suffered by injured Dhanraj have been attributed to co-accused Vijendra. None of the injuries attributed to the present petitioner [2026:RJ-JP:22438] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7229/2026] have been opined to be dangerous to life. Petitioner is behind the bars since 26.04.2026 though one case has been reported against him, however, in that case he is already bailed out. Charge-sheet has already been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, in view of the above factual matrix no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application of the petitioner. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Dhanraj S/o Ambalal, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/74