HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 40767 of 2026 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J. 1. Heard Mr. Satya Prakash Singh, learned Counsel for the applicants and learned AGA for the State and perused the records. 2. The present application under Section 528 BNSS has been filed by the applicants with the following prayer: "It, is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to allow the present application under section 528 of B.N.S.S. and quash the charge sheet dated 07.09.2012 as well as entire proceedings of Sessions Case No. 149 of 2024 State Versus Satyaveer and others arising out of Case Crime No. 1890 of 2011, Section 323, 504, 506, 498-A I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, Police Station- Indirapuram, District-Ghaziabad and also quash the order dated 26.02.2013, whereby the learned Magistrate took cognizance upon the aforesaid charge sheet and summoned the applicants pending in the 8th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghaziabad on the basis of compromise/ settlement between the parties on 04.10.2025 which is dully verified by learned Trial Court vide order dated 10.06.2026." 3. Learned Counsel for the applicants has submitted that the applicants and opposite party no.2 have compromised the dispute. It is further argued that the said compromise has also been verified by the concerned Trial Court, as such the proceedings against the applicants may be quashed. 4. Learned A.G.A. admitted the fact of compromise and stated that he has no objection if the proceeding of the aforesaid case is quashed against the applicants. 5. From the perusal of the record it is apparent that parties have entered into compromise and have settled their dispute amicably. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Satya Prakash Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Satyaveer And 5 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) 6. The law with regards to quashing of a case on the basis of settlement arrived between the parties, is well settled. The Apex Court in the cases of (1) B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another: (2003)4 SCC 675; (2) Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation : (2008) 9 SCC 677; (3) Manoj Sharma Vs. State and others: ( 2008) 16 SCC 1; (4) Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab: (2012) 10 SCC 303; (5) Shaifullah and others Vs. State of U.P. And another: 2013 (83) ACC 278 and (6) Parbatbhai Ahir@Parbatbhai @ Bhimsinbhai Karmur and others Vs. State of Gujarat and another: (2017) 9 SCC 641 has held that the cases in which the parties have settled their grievances can be quashed. 7. From perusal of the records and the law laid down by the Apex Court on the subject matter, the present case is a good case for exercising powers by this Court to quash the proceedings as prayed for by the applicants. 8. The entire proceedings of the aforesaid case with regard to the present applicants are hereby quashed. 9. The present application is allowed. September 23, 2026 Vijay NA528 No. 40767 of 2026 2 (Chawan Prakash,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KUMAR SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad