Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 840 (RAJ)

MAYANK VASHISHT ALIAS RAHUL SHARMA S/O GIRIRAJ VASHISHT v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/1533/2026 · 2026-03-17

Sameer Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:11259] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1533/2026 Mayank Vashisht Alias Rahul Sharma S/o Giriraj Vashisht, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Sahiwala Ki Gali, Opposite Meera Park, Bhattiyani Chohatta, Girwa Udaipur, Shastri Circle Udaipur Police Station Surajpol, District Udaipur (Rajasthan, Currently Bhainsodamandi, Police Station Bhanpura, District Mandsaur (M.p.) (Presently Accused Petitioner In Confined At Sub Jail Bhawanimandi). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hitanshu Joshi with Mr. Anmol Dhakar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP Mr. Rajveer Singh Jhala HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 17/03/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 05/2026 registered at Police Station Bhawani Mandi District Jhalawar for the offence(s) under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 61(2) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the applicant is a young man aged 27 years. It is submitted that the matter is triable by Magistrate and applicant has no criminal antecedents. It is further submitted that charge-sheet has been filed and applicant is in custody ever since 07.01.2026. Learned counsel further submits that the conclusion of trial is likely to take [2026:RJ-JP:11259] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1533/2026] a long time and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant behind bars till disposal of the case. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Having heard the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that accused- applicant is a young man of 27 years; that the matter is triable my Magistrate; that charge-sheet has been filed; that accused- applicant is in custody ever since 07.01.2026; that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused-applicant and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant and enlarge him on bail. 5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Mayank Vashisht Alias Rahul Sharma S/o Giriraj Vashisht shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /36