Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8396 (CAL)

SK. SULTAN v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/16268/2025 · 2026-04-13

Saugata Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2. 2. (DL) (DL) 13.04.2026 13.04.2026 Ct. No. 05 (ARPAN) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction (Appellate Side) W.P.A. 16268 OF 2025 SK SULTAN VS. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS …………… Mr. Busra Khatun, Adv. Md. Kashif Alam, Adv. …for the Petitioner Mr. Suman Sengupta, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Chakraborty, Adv. …for the State Mr. Shamik Chatterjee, Adv. Mr. Aditya Bikram Mahata, Adv. Mr. Sahil Kabir, Adv. …for the Private Respondent 1. Matter has come up under the heading ‘To Be Mentioned’ on being mentioned by the learned advocate representing the petitioner. 2. Learned advocate representing the petitioner submits that petitioner does not want to proceed with the matter. 3. State respondents and respondent nos.8 & 9 are represented by learned advocates. 4. In view of aforesaid submission made on behalf of the petitioner, writ petition stands dismissed on the ground of non-prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Parties to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court. (SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA, J.)