DEENA @ DEENBANDHU YADUVANSHI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
NABAIL/9581/2026 · 2026-09-22
Rajiv Lochan Shukla
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8394 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8394 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9581 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J.
1. After some arguments, Learned counsel for the applicant prays that he may be permitted to approach the concerned Court for seeking regular bail. He further prays that for a short time, the interest of the applicant may be protected.
2. The Learned AGA has no objection to the said prayer.
3. Taking into account the submissions made by the Learned counsel for the parties, it is directed that in case the applicant appears before the Court concerned within a period of four weeks from today and applies for bail in Case Crime No.299 of 2026 under Sections 115(2), 109(1), 308(5), 125, 131, 352 and 351(3) of BNS 2023, Police Station Kosi Kalan, District Mathura, his application for bail shall be considered and disposed of expeditiously, in accordance with the law, without being influenced by any observations made by the concerned Court while rejecting the anticipatory bail application of the applicant.
4. For a period of four weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case.
5. With the aforesaid observations/directions, this application stands disposed of. September 23, 2026/A. Pandey Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Aryan Rathore, Ashutosh Mishra, Shivam Tiwari, Syed Abid Ali Naqvi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Deena @ Deenbandhu Yaduvanshi .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ANAND PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad