SAKSHI PRAKASH DAINGADE D/O PRAKASH DAINGADE, W/O VIKAS v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLW/862/2026 · 2026-05-27
Bhuwan Goyal
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8392 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8392 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:22650] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 862/2026
1. Sakshi Prakash Daingade D/o Prakash Daingade, W/o Vikas, Aged About 21 Years, Resident Of VTC Dhaingade Wadi, PO-Anagar, Sub District Mohol, District Solapur State Maharashtra. Presently Residing At Alwar Road, Nagar, Bharatpur Rajasthan.
2. Vikas S/o Mukesh Chand, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of Alwar Road, Nagar, Bharatpur Rajasthan. Presently Residing At Alwar Road, Nagar, Bharatpur Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principle Secretary Department Of Home, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. (Raj.)
2. Director General Of Police (South), Police Head Quarter, Jaipur. (Raj.)
3. Police
Commissioner,
Police
Commissionerate, Government Hostel Chauraha, Jaipur Rajasthan
4. The Superintendent Of Police, Bharatpur. (Raj.)
5. The S.H.O., P.S. Nagar, District Bharatpur (Raj.)
6. Prakash Daingade S/o Kundlik Daingade, Resident Of Vtc Dhaingade Wadi, Po- Anagar, Sub District Mohol, District Solapur State Maharashtra
7. Sangeeta W/o Prakash Daingade, R/o Vtc Dhaingade Wadi, Po-Anagar, Sub District Mohol, District Solapur State Maharashtra
8. Prithvi Raj S/o Prakash Daingade, R/o Vtc Dhaingade Wadi, Po- Anagar, Sub District Mohol, District Solapur State 8. Maharashtra
9. Mahesh S/o Kundlik Daingade, R/o Vtc Dhaingade Wadi, PO- Anagar, Sub District Mohol, District Solapur State 8. Maharashtra ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Manju Chauhan Mr. Arvind Sharma
[2026:RJ-JP:22650] (2 of 3) [CRLW-862/2026] For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Order 27/05/2026
1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled.
2. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos. 6 to 9 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are major to take decision of their life. He submits that petitioners solemnized their marriage on 13.05.2026 at Shiv Temple Court Campus, Alwar, Rajasthan and same has been registered before the Marriage Registration Officer, Alwar. A copy of the petitioners’ marriage registration certificate has been annexed with the petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos. 6 to 9 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has placed reliance upon the
judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522.
5. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the same.
6. Both the petitioners are present in person today in the court. Their signatures have been obtained on the court’s order sheet and they have been duly identified by their counsel.
[2026:RJ-JP:22650] (3 of 3) [CRLW-862/2026]
7. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners are directed to file an appropriate application seeking protection before the concerned SHO, who in turn, is
directed that if such an application is filed before him, he will provide adequate protection to the petitioners as per law and ensure that no harm is caused to them.
8. The Criminal Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
9. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
10. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect other civil/ criminal proceedings, if any pending in the present matter.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J 294/Ritu