Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8389 (ALL)

ASHISH YADAV AND ANOTHER v. RAMJANAM AND 5 OTHERS

A227/13278/2026 · 2026-09-22

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

Civil Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13278 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This is plaintiffs' petition. 2. In the suit filed by plaintiffs, an application for grant of temporary injunction was moved which was rejected against which a misc. civil appeal under Order XLIII Rule 1(r) CPC has been filed, which is pending consideration. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for expeditious disposal of the said appeal. 3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon court concerned to decide the Misc. Civil Appeal No. 70 of 2024, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. September 23, 2026 (V. S. SINGH) Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Virendra Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Ashish Yadav And Another .....Petitioner(s) Ramjanam And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad