Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8385 (AP)

ALAMURI VIJAYAKUMARI v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/6870/2023 · 2026-08-10

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010134192023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] TUESDAY, THE 11th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 6870/2023 Between: Alamuri Vijayakumari ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Ap and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NAGARAJU NAGURU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order: Aggrieved by non-consideration of the petitioner’s representations dated 27.02.2023 & 01.03.2023, the present writ petition is filed. 2. Heard Sri Chakravarthy, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Venkata Satyanarayana, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue. 2 3. Sri Chakravarthy, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is not in contact with the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Sri Venkata Satyanarayana, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue while placing reliance on the counter filed by the Tahsildar, Undi mandal submitted that, the 3rd respondent has already issued an endorsement dated 13.04.2023 on the petitioner’s representations, therefore there remains nothing for adjudication in this writ petition and accordingly prayed to dismiss the writ petition. 5. When the matter is pending consideration, the parties should invariably be in touch with their respective counsel for adjudication of the matter, failing which; it can be considered that the parties have no interest in prosecuting the same. Since the matter is of the year 2023 and as the counter would indicate that the authorities have already issued an endorsement dated 13.04.2023 on the petitioner’s representations, there remains nothing for adjudication in this writ petition and the same is liable to be closed. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. No costs. Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI BRS