RAM PRATAP PATEL AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
CRLR/5621/2026 · 2026-09-23
Sanjiv Kumar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8382 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8382 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 5621 of 2026 Court No. - 88 HON'BLE SANJIV KUMAR, J.
1. Heard Shri Ambrish Chandra Pandey, learned Counsel for the revisionists and learned A.G.A on behalf of the State.
2. At the stage of admission of this revision, learned Counsel for the revisionists submits that he does not want to press this revision and wants to withdraw it.
3. Learned AGA has no objection to the aforesaid prayer made by learned counsel for the revisionists.
4. In view of the above, the instant revision is dismissed as withdrawn, at the admission stage. September 24, 2026 AdityaG Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Ambrish Chandra Pandey, Pramod Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Sanjiv Kumar,J.) Ram Pratap Patel And Another .....Revisionist(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ADITYA GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad