Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 13369 of 2026 Saroj Kumar Patra ..... Petitioner Mr. S.K. Pradhan (3), Advocate -versus- The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-II, Ganjam & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. C.K. Pradhan, AGA CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 02.05.2026 Order No. 01 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties. 3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “In the aforesaid circumstances it is therefore humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to: (i) Admit this Writ Petition and issue 'Rule NISI', and (ii)And the opposite parties, more particularly the opposite parties Nos. 1 & 2 named above may kindly be called upon to file show-cause as to why appropriate writ or writs or direction shall not be issued directing them for computation of the quantum of monthly pension of this petitioner afresh and after due computation for payment of actual monthly pension to this petitioner from the date of due by cancelling pro-rate calculation and count the service up-to 60 year pay arrear with interest; And Page 2 of 2. (iii) If the opposite parties fail to file show cause and/or file insufficient cause then after hearing the parties may kindly issue appropriate writ or writs or direction directing them for computation of the quantum of monthly pension of this petitioner afresh and after due computation for payment of actual monthly pension to this petitioner from the date of due for the interest of justice, equity and fair play; And (iv) Further be pleased to pass any other / further order /orders, as this Hon'ble Court deem fit and proper for ends of justice. And for this act of kindness, the petitioner, as duty bound, shall ever pray.” 4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that though highlighting his grievances, Petitioner has filed a representation at Annexure-3 to the Writ Petition before the Opp. Party No. 1, but till date nothing has been done in the matter. In such background, learned counsel for the Petitioner prays that a direction be issued to Opposite Party No. 1 to take a decision on the above noted Petition within a specific time period. 5. Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs Opposite Party No. 1 to take a decision on the above noted petition in accordance with law, within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of this order and communicate the result of such exercise to the Petitioner. 6. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Sneha