Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8379 (RAJ)

SUMAN DEVI, W/O GOPAL LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/341/2026 · 2026-05-20

Bhuwan Goyal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 341/2026 1. Suman Devi, W/o Gopal Lal, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Jakharo Ke Dhani, Deeppura, Manda Bhimsingh, Manda Bhim Singh, Jaipur Rajasthan. 2. Gopal Lal Jakhad, S/o Narayan Lal Jat, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Jakharo Ke Dhani, Deeppura,deeppura, Jaipur Rajasthan. 3. Manish Kumar Choudhary, S/o Gopal Lal Jakhad, Aged About 13 Years, R/o Deeppura, Manda Bhimsingh, Jaipur Rajasthan, Through Legal Gurdian Her Mother. 4. Anil S/o Gopal Lal, Aged About 14 Years, R/o Jakharo Ki Dhani, Deeppura, Jaipur Rajasthan. Through Legal Gurdian Her Mother. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. S.P., Jaipur District Rural Jaipur. 3. Station House Officer, Police Station Jobner, Jaipur District Rural Jaipur. 4. Surajmal S/o Narayan Lal, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Deeppura, Jakharo Ki Dhani, Jobner Jaipur Rajasthan. 5. Nitin S/o Surajmal, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Deeppura, Jakharo Ki Dhani, Jobner Jaipur Rajasthan. 6. Hanuman S/o Kanaram, Aged About 70 Years, R/o Deeppura, Jakharo Ki Dhani, Jobner Jaipur Rajasthan. 7. Girdhari S/o Kanaram, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Deeppura, Jakharo Ki Dhani, Jobner Jaipur Rajasthan. 8. Madan S/o Hanuman, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Deeppura, Jakharo Ki Dhani, Jobner Jaipur Rajasthan. 9. Raju S/o Hanuman, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Deeppura, Jakharo Ki Dhani, Jobner Jaipur Rajasthan. 10. Mahendra S/o- Shri Raju, Aged About 25 Years, R/o- Deeppura, Jakharo Ki Dhani, Jobner Jaipur Rajasthan. 11. Babulal, S/o- Shri Madan, Aged About 25 Years, R/o- Deeppura, Jakharo Ki Dhani, Jobner Jaipur Rajasthan. 12. Mukesh, S/o- Shri Raju, Aged About 20 Years, R/o- (2 of 3) [CRLW-341/2026] Deeppura, Jakharo Ki Dhani, Jobner Jaipur Rajasthan. 13. Rameshvar, S/o- Shri Hanuman, Aged About 40 Years, R/o- Deeppura, Jakharo Ki Dhani, Jobner Jaipur Rajasthan. 14. Jagdeesh Ghayal, S/o- Shri Devaram, Aged About 40 Years, R/o- Bhojpura Khurdh, Jobner, District Jaipur Rural Jaipur. 15. Jeevan Lal, S/o- Shri Pema Ram, Aged About 50 Years, R/o- Deeppura, Jakharo Ki Dhani, Jobner Jaipur Rajasthan. 16. Sardar, S/o- Shri Jeevan Lal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o- Deeppura, Jakharo Ki Dhani, Jobner Jaipur Rajasthan. 17. Seemu, S/o- Shri Goru, Aged About 30 Years, R/o- Keerava, Jobner, Jaipur Rural Jaipur. 18. Kanaram, S/o- Shri Jodharam, Aged About 35 Years, R/o- Mohan Ka Bass, Jobner, Jaipur District Rural Jaipur. 19. Govindram, S/o- Shri Jodhara, Aged About 30 Years, R/o- Mohan Ka Bass, Jobner, Jaipur District Rural Jaipur. 20. Bardaram, S/o- Shri Nandara, Aged About 70 Years, R/o- Bandiya Ka Bass, Jobner, Jaipur District Rural Jaipur. 21. Pappu Ram, S/o- Shri Nandaram, Aged About 50 Years, R/o- Bandiya Ka Bass, Jobner, Jaipur District Rural Jaipur. 22. Omprakash, S/o- Shri Bhanwarlal, Aged About 40 Years, R/o- Bandiya Ka Bass, Jobner, Jaipur District Rural Jaipur. 23. Prakash, S/o- Shri Bhanwarlal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o- Bandiya Ka Bass, Jobner, Jaipur District Rural Jaipur. 24. Santosh, W/o- Shri Surajmal, Aged About 40 Years, R/o- Deeppura, Jakharo Ki Dhani, Jobner Jaipur Rajasthan. 25. Nansi Devi, W/o- Shri Madan, Aged About 40 Years, Deeppura, Jakharo Ki Dhani, Jobner Jaipur Rajasthan. 26. Manju, D/o- Shri Madan, Aged About 20 Years, Deeppura, Jakharo Ki Dhani, Jobner Jaipur Rajasthan. 27. Lali, W/o- Shri Rameshvar, Aged About 35 Years, Deeppura, Jakharo Ki Dhani, Jobner Jaipur Rajasthan. 28. Dapu Devi, W/o- Shri Banna Ram, Aged About 45 Years, Deeppura, Jakharo Ki Dhani, Jobner Jaipur Rajasthan. ----Respondents (3 of 3) [CRLW-341/2026] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 20/05/2026 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this Criminal Writ Petition with liberty to file an application before the competent court. Permission, as sought for, is granted. This Criminal Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty. However, in the event such application is filed, it is expected that the competent Court shall decide the same expeditiously, in accordance with law. All pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J Gourav/216