- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8325 WP No. 19533 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 19533 OF 2022 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. KRISHNA MALLEGOWDA S/O BUDIKEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, NO.246, 3RD STAGE, "B" BLOCK, VIJAYANAGARA, MYSORE - 570 030. 2. SRI. B. BOREGOWDA S/O LATE BEEREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, DUDDAGERE, VARUNA HOBLI, MYSORE TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT - 570 030. 3. SRI B SHIVARAJ S/O C.L. BOPRE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, NO.641, DOPUBLE ROAD, SARASWATHIPURAM, MYSORE-570 009. 4. SRI M V VISHAKANTA S/O LATE M MAHADEVAIAH, NO.1212, 7TH MAIN, 12TH CROSS, VIJAYANAGAR, 1ST STAGE, MYSORE - 570 017. 5. SRI B LAKKEGOWDA S/O LATE BYRAPPA, NO.450, 15TH MAIN ROAD, Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8325 WP No. 19533 of 2022 T.K. LAYOUT, MYSORE - 570 009. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. Y D HARSHA.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. UNIVERSITY OF MYSORE REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR CRAWFORD HALL, VISHWAVIDYANILAYA KARYA SOUDHA, K.G.KOPPAL SARASWATHIPURAM, MYSURU-570 005. 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NANDINI B.S., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. RAJENDRA KUMAR SUNGAY T P.,ADVOCATE FOR R1; SMT. B.P. RADHA., AGA FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE RESOLUTION NO.2022/6.31 AND 2022/6.32 DATED 22.08.2022 PASSED BY SYNDICATE OF THE R-1 IN THE MEETING HELD ON 22.08.2022 VIDE ANNX-C. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FURTHER HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8325 WP No. 19533 of 2022 ORAL ORDER None appears for the petitioners. 2. On 04.02.2026, this Court passed the following: ORDER '' None appears for the petitioners. 2. Issue raised in this petition is questioning the resolution passed by Syndicate of respondent No.1- University. In terms of which, it had resolved to withdraw Rs.50 crores from LIC Corpus Fund. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent No.1 files a memo which reads as under: ''The Respondent No.1 submits as under:- The Petitioner in the above petition has sought for a writ in the nature of Certiorari to quash the Resolution No.2022/6.31 & 2022/6.32 dated 22.08.2022 passed by the Syndicate of this Respondent at its meeting held on 22.08.2022 and other reliefs. The prayer sought by the petitioner does not survive for consideration as during the pendency of the above petition this respondent has already credited the amount which was drawn from LIC's Management of Pension and Gratuity Funds of Mysore University as and when state government released the grants to the university and as such the decision dated 22.08.2022 which is sought to be quashed (vide Annexure-C) by the petitioner does not survive for consideration as on date. Hence, the above petition may kindly be disposed of as having become infructuous, in the interest of justice and equity.'' 4. Since there is no representation of the petitioner, to hear the say of the petitioner, list this matter finally on 11.02.2026 for further hearing. '' - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8325 WP No. 19533 of 2022 3. Even today there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. 4. Smt. Nandini B.S., learned counsel representing on behalf of Sri. Rajendra Kumar Sungay T.P., learned counsel for respondent No.1. 5. Taking note of the submission made on behalf of the learned counsel for the respondents, petition is dismissed. Sd/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE RL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15