Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8364 (JHR)

SANJAY PRASAD YADAV ALLIAS SANJAY YADAAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./235/2026 · 2026-01-19

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:1337 --1-- A.B.A. No. 235 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 235 of 2026 ---- 1.Sanjay Prasad Yadav @ Sanjay Yadav, aged about 30 years, S/o Vishwanath Yadav, resident of village – Harlal Tola, Hariharpur, Gorbanna, PO and PS – Godda (M), District – Godda 2.Chandan Kumar Yadav, aged about 35 years, S/o Shankar Prasad Yadav, resident of village – Pasai, PO and PS – Poraiyahat, District - Godda .... Petitioners -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioners :- Mr. Ashish Kr. Thakur, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Prabhu Dayal Agarwal, Advocate ---- 04/19.01.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Godda (Muffasil) P.S. Case No.206 of 2025, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 317(5) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Section 11 of Prevention of Animal Cruelty Act, 1960 and Section 12(1) of Jharkhand Bovine Animal Prohibition of Slaughter Act, 2005 pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Godda. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are owner and driver respectively of the pickup van and the allegations are made that in a cruel manner bovine animals were being carried in the said pickup van. He further submits that the said consignment was booked up by another person and that was on the valid purchase. He then submits that the petitioners have got no criminal 2026:JHHC:1337 --2-- A.B.A. No. 235 of 2026 antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.17 of the petition. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that in a cruel manner bovine animals were being carried. 5. Considering that the petitioners are owner and driver respectively of the pickup van and the consignment of bovine animals was booked up by another person as disclosed in paragraph No.9 of the petition and the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.17 of the petition, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the petitioners, above named, are hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of their surrender/arrest, the petitioners, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Godda in connection with Godda (Muffasil) P.S. Case No.206 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 19.01.2026 Sangam/