[2026:RJ-JP:21274] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5228/2026 Ashok Urf S.P. S/o Jainarayan, Age 23 Years, R/o Babaji Ki Dhani Tan Khadab, Police Thana Sarund, Dist. Kotputli Behror (Raj.) (Accused At Presently Confined In Khetri) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through its P.P., Khetri Raj. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Omveer Singh Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 20/05/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 161/2024 registered at Police Station Khetri, District Neem Ka Thana for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 132 & 109(1) of B.N.S., 2023 and Section 3 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 08.01.2026. He further submits that charge-sheet has already been filed; that the accused-petitioner is not named in the FIR and the co-accused Rahul S/o Ram Singh has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 09.03.2026 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2181/2026. He further submits that neither the complainant nor any person have sustained any [2026:RJ-JP:21274] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5228/2026] injury; conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused- petitioners hereinabove and submits that there are criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioner. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for both the parties; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 08.01.2026; that charge-sheet has already been filed and the co-accused Rahul S/o Ram Singh has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 09.03.2026 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2181/2026; that neither the complainant nor any other person have sustained any injuries; that the trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Ashok Urf S.P. S/o Jainarayan is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is [2026:RJ-JP:21274] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5228/2026] transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve himself in any offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence once in a month in the concerned police station. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J PUNEET KUMAR/30