Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8360 (CHH)

SANJAY SINGH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/5611/2025 · 2026-01-26

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:4400 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5611 of 2025 Sanjay Singh S/o Shri Mata Bux Singh Aged About 45 Years Occupation - Bus Operator, R/o Gali No. 2 Imlipara, Near Old Bus Stand, Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Transport Department, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Regional Transport Authority Chhattisgarh, Through Its Chairman, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - S. Prakash Regional Transport Authority, State Of Chhattisgarh, Atal Nagar, Sector- 27, Third Floor, Nawa Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 4 - K.K Patel Joint Secretary Regional Transport Authority, Atal Nagar, Sector- 27, Third Floor, Nawa Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 5 - Rakesh Kurre S/o Shri Dhaniram Kurre Occupation - Bus Operator, R/o Gram Bakarkuda, Po- Tikari Thana - Masturi, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) .. Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Bajpai, Advocate For Respondents 1 & 2/State : Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, Panel Lawyer (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 27.01.2026 1. Heard on IA No.02/2026, application for withdrawal of the writ petition. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition has been preferred against Order dated 25.7.2025 passed by the Regional Transport BINI PRADEEP Digitally signed by BINI PRADEEP Date: 2026.01.28 17:35:42 +0530 2 Authority, Raipur (CG), whereby permit to run the bus has been granted to respondent No.5 without complying the mandatory provisions of the Motor Vehicle Act and Rules. He further submits at this stage, the petitioner does not want to prosecute the petition further, hence, he may be permitted to withdraw this petition. 3. On due consideration of the facts narrated by learned counsel for the petitioner, IA No.02/2026 is allowed and learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this petition. 4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Bini