Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 836 (RAJ)

NIKITA DUBEY W/O SHASHANK SINGH, D/O BHUVNESHWAR DUBEY, v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/384/2026 · 2026-03-17

Anil Kumar Upman

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:11336] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 384/2026 1. Nikita Dubey W/o Shashank Singh, D/o Bhuvneshwar Dubey, Aged About 23 Years, R/o 193, Balaji Ka Mandir, D.h. Hospital Ke Pass, Siddharth Nagar, Meena Paladi, Looniyawas, Dist. Jaipur, (Raj.). 2. Shashank Singh S/o Aanand Singh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Bodasar Khurd, Pokhara, Jaunpur, Uttar Pradesh. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Lal Kothi, Jaipur (Raj.). 3. The Additional Superintendent Of Police, Jaipur East, Dist- Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. The Station House Officer, Police Station Jamdoli, Jaipur (East), Dist. Jaipur, (Raj.). 5. Bhuvneshwar Dubey S/o Umashankar Dubey, R/o 193, Balaji Ka Mandir, D.h. Hospital Ke Pass, Siddharth Nagar, Meena Paladi, Looniyawas, Dist. Jaipur, (Raj.). 6. Manju Dubey W/o Bhuvneshwar Dubey, R/o 193, Balaji Ka Mandir, D.h. Hospital Ke Pass, Siddharth Nagar, Meena Paladi, Looniyawas, Dist. Jaipur, (Raj.). 7. Arvind Kumar Mishra S/o Jagat Narayan Mishra, R/o Nagpur, Maharashtra. 8. Dharmendra Kumar Mishra S/o Jagat Narayan Mishra, R/o Nagpur, Maharashtra. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Bochaliya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 17/03/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled. 2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel. [2026:RJ-JP:11336] (2 of 3) [CRLW-384/2026] 3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.5 to 8 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are mature enough to take decision of their life. It is submitted that petitioners have entered into marriage as per Hindu Rites and Customs at Arya Samaj Sanstha, Naya Kheda, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan on 03.02.2026 and same has been registered on 03.02.2026. The certificate of registration of marriage of the petitioners is annexed with this petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos.5 to 8 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection. 5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.4-Station House Officer, Police Station Jamdoli, Jaipur (East), District Jaipur, (Raj.) and respondent no.4 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. 6. The criminal writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. [2026:RJ-JP:11336] (3 of 3) [CRLW-384/2026] 8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /198