Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 836 (CHH)

Zebanaz Khan v. State of Chhattisgarh

WPS/10293/2019 · 2026-02-10

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:7628 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 10293 of 2019 1. Zebanaz Khan W/o Sheikh Samim, D/o Abdul Hamim Khan, Aged About 31 Years, R/o House No. 1 New Hospital Colony Bijapur, District Bijapur Chhattisgarh. 2. Manju Lata Karami D/o Bugur Ram Karami, Aged About 29 Years, R/o House No. 71 School Para Nelsanar Bhairamgarh District Bijapur Chhattisgarh. 3. Madhu Malika Chapadi D/o Narayan Chapadi Aged About 29 Years R/o Pujari Para Madded Bhopalpatanam District Bijapur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Health And Family Welfare Department Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Police Station Rakhi, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2. The Director Health Services Chhattisgarh Vibhagadhyachh Block 1, Third Floor Indrawati Bhawan Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3. Divisional Joint Director Bastar Health Services Bastar Division Jagdalpur District Bastar Chhattisgarh. 4. Chief Medical And Health Officer Bijapur, District Bijapur Chhattisgarh. 5. Gauri Rao D/o Apparao Working As Nurse At District Hospital Bijapur, R/o District Hospital Premises Bijapur District Bijapur Chhattisgarh. ANKIT KUMAR SINGH Digitally signed by ANKIT KUMAR SINGH Date: 2026.02.12 10:47:16 +0530 2 6. Manjulata Sinha D/o Shiv Kumar Working As Nurse At District Hospital Bijapur, R/o Old Forest Colony Bijapur District Bijapur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioners :- Mr. Abhishek Nirala, Advocate, on behalf of Mr. P.K. Tulsyan, Advocate. For State :- Mr. Amit Buxy, Dy. G.A. For Respondents No.5 & 6:- Mr. Keshav Dewangan, Advocate. SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 11.02.2026 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that then instant writ petition has become infructuous. 2. In view of the above submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the instant writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Ankit