[2026:RJ-JP:21311] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8988/2026 1. Rekha Meena D/o. Ghasiram Meena, Aged About 29 Years, R/o. Vill. Bhawsar Isharwala, Post. Mansar Khedi, Th. Bassi, Dist. Jaipur, Rajasthan. 303301. 2. Bhagirath Dan Charan S/o Gopal Dan Charan, Aged About 32 Years, R/o. Vpo Khileriya, Dist. Churu, Rajasthan. 331022. 3. Vikram Kumar S/o. Eshra Ram, Aged About 26 Years, R/o. Vp Gundau Th. Sanchore, Dist. Jalore, Rajasthan. 343040. 4. Manoj Kumar S/o Jagdeesh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o. Vill. Bavri Post, Baroda, Th. Bayana, Dist. Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 321402. 5. Shiv Prakash S/o Tau Ram, Aged About 27 Years, R/o. Nathrau, Chamu, Sekhala, Dist. Jodhpur, Rajasthan.342309 6. Rakesh Gaura S/o Mohan Ram Gaura, Aged About 30 Years, R/o. Vpo Padu Kalan, Th. Riyan Bari, Dist. Nagaur, Rajasthan 341031. 7. Suresh Chand Jat S/o Ram Lal Jat, Aged About 32 Years, R/o. Rohisa, Th. Riyan Badi, Dist. Nagaur, Rajasthan. 341513. 8. Sarita D/o. Munshi Ram, Aged About 36 Years, R/o. Vpo Bharounda Kalan Via, Islampur, Th. Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. 333024. 9. Saroj D/o Leeladhar, Aged About 39 Years, R/o. 30, Vinayak Nagar, 7 E, Choti, Dist. Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan. 335001. 10. Yadvendra Meena S/o. Samay Singh, Aged About 37 Years, R/o. Vpo Sewa, Th. Wazirpur, Dist. Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan. 322219. 11. Susheela Regar D/o. Balu Ram Regar, Aged About 29 Years, R/o. Regar Mohalla, Ward No. 25, Th. Sahda, Dist. Bhilwara, Rajasthan. 311801. 12. Vikram Singh S/o Mohan Lal, Aged About 33 Years, R/o. Vill Kotda, Post. Karwada, Th. Raniwara, Dist. Jalore, Rajasthan. 343040. [2026:RJ-JP:21311] (2 of 5) [CW-8988/2026] 13. Suresh Kumar S/o Poonama Ram, R/o. Vpo Surachand, Th. Chitalwana, Jalore, Rajasthan. 343027. 14. Manju Dangi D/o. Kaku Ram Dangi, Aged About 34 Years, R/o. Bhesda Kalan, Udaipur, Rajasthan. 313024 15. Chander Kala Deg S/o Mahaveer Deg, Aged About 30 Years, R/o. Silwani Po Manaksar, Suratgarh, Dist. Sri Ganganagar, State Rajasthan. 335804. 16. Bhavna Sukhadiya S/o Omprakash, Aged About 27 Years, R/o. Jatiyo Ka Mohalla Juni Vas Samdari Th. Samdari, Dist. Barmer, Rajasthan. 344021 17. Veekesh Kumar Jatav S/o. Raju Jatav, Aged About 31 Years, R/o. Vill. Singhan Jatt, Post. Pali, Th. Suroth, Dist. Karauli, Rajasthan. 322236. 18. Rajendra Kumar S/o Pura Ram, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Ward No. 04, Vpo. Hindor, Post Rajiasar, District Shri Ganganagar, Rajasthan-335804 19. . Minakshi Choubisa D/o. Shanti Lal Choubisa, Aged About 30 Years, R/o. Vpo Kheda Samore, Th. Aspur, Dist. Dungarpur, Rajasthan. 314034 20. Ranveer Bhadu S/o. Nand Ram, Aged About 31 Years, R/o. Ward No. 7, Opp. New Dhan Mandi, Gate No. 2, Dist. Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan. 335804. 21. Pramod Kumari D/o. Jhabar Mal Samota, Aged About 28 Years, R/o. Shyampura Purvi Th. Bantaramgarh, Dist. Sikar, Rajasthan. 332403. 22. Sachin Gurjar S/o Gyan Singh Gurjar, Aged About 23 Years, R/o. Pailet Nagar Bai Pass, Road Hundaun City, Karauli, Rajasthan.322230 23. Aditi Yadav D/o. Jagdish Prasad Yadav, Aged About 33 Years, R/o. Dhani Sethawali, Nathawala, Shahpura, Dist. Jaipur. Rajasthan. 303103. 24. Surendra Indoliya S/o Ramniwash Indoliya, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Vill. Dhursi, Post Vijaypura, Teh. Hindaun City, District Karauli, Rajasthan-322236 25. Nikhil Kumar Gurjar S/o. Lal Chand Gurjar, Aged About 31 Years, R/o. Vill. Teekampura, Post. Bhanpur Kalan, Th. Jamwaramgarh, Dist. Jaipur, Rajasthan.302028 26. Sulochana Nagar D/o. Ram Lal Nagar, Aged About 30 [2026:RJ-JP:21311] (3 of 5) [CW-8988/2026] Years, R/o. Vill. Rangpuriya (Nayaganv), Post. Chitawa, Th. Keshorai Patan, Dist. Bundi, Rajasthan. 323602. 27. Rubeena Bano D/o Nasir Mohammed, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Ansari Mohalla City, District Sawaimadhpur, Rajasthan-322021 ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Education Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Janpath, Jaipur 2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Secretary, Rajya Krishi Prabandh Sansthan Parisar, Durgapura, Jaipur-302018 3. The Director, Elementary Education Rajasthan, Lalgarh Palace, Near Unnamed Road, Samta Nagar, Bikaner 334001. 4. Mamta Meena D/o Prahlad Meena, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Ismailepura, Post Bagdi, District Tonk, State Rajasthan - 304801 5. Deepak Depawat S/o Bhawani Dan Charan, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Jain Jawahar Mandal Ke Pass Deshnok, District - Bikaner, State-Rajasthan - 334801. 6. Ranjit Meghwal S/o Jagdish Prasad, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Amarsar Rajasar Bikav, Sardarshahar, District Churu, Rajasthan-331403. 7. Ravina D/o Mahender Gorchhiya, Aged About 25 Years, R/ o Ward No.4, Vpo Dhannasar, Tehsil Rawatsar, District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan-335524. 8. Babu Lal S/o Jasu Singh, R/o Rau Teeba, Dhingi, District Churu, Rajasthan-331023. 9. Priyanka Kumari D/o Narsingh Ram, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Jingar Colony, Sanchore, Tehsil Sanchore, District Jalore, Rajasthan-343041. 10. Pooja Kumari D/o Nopa Ram, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Vpo Mandawara, Teh. Dhod, District- Sikar, State- Rajasthan- 332021 11. Sunil Kumar S/o Balveer, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Ward No.3, Vpo 16 Ag Bhompura, Rawatsar Hanumangarh, [2026:RJ-JP:21311] (4 of 5) [CW-8988/2026] Districrt Hanumangarh, Rajasthan-335524. 12. Ekata D/o Ramji Lal Sihag, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Vill. Jasana, Th. Nohar Na, District Hanumangarh, State Rajasthan - 335523 13. Nitesh Nagar D/o Hansraj Nagar, Aged About 30 Years, R/ o Vpo Jakhoda, Teh. Ladpura, Dist. Kota, Raj. 325001 14. Veeree Singh S/o Malua Ram, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Nagla Mathally, Post Mahamadpura, Tehsil Bayana, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan-321405 15. Mehnaz Bhati D/o Mohammad Saleem, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Ward No.19, Ratangarh, District Churu, Rajasthan-331022. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma Mr. Anand Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 20/05/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition with following prayer: “It is, therefore, respectfully prayed on grounds above mentioned that the writ petition may kindly be accepted and allowed and i)To Issue appropriate order or direction to respondents to give appointment to the petitioners on the post of Teacher Grade III Level II as the petitioners have scored more marks than already appointed candidates. ii) To direct the respondents to consider the candidature of the petitioners in the aforesaid recruitment and allow the petitioners to participate in the further recruitment process. iii)To direct to respondents to initiate the process of final recruitment and final appointment on the basis of revised result so that the petitioners having higher marks could be appointed on the post of Teacher Grade III Level II. iv) Any other order or relief, which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper, may also be passed in favour of the petitioners. “ [2026:RJ-JP:21311] (5 of 5) [CW-8988/2026] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in this writ petition has already been decided by this Court vide order dated 11.05.2026 passed in S.B. CWP No. 13045/2025 (Yasmeen Bee D/o Nijamuddin & ors. Vs. State Of Rajasthan & Ors. & other connected matters. Hence, the petitioner should also be extended the similar benefits. 3. This Court finds that while deciding the case of Yasmeen Bee D/o Nijamuddin & ors.(Supra), the benefits of the judgment were confined only to the petitioners before the Court prior to date of judgment in the case of Yasmeen Bee D/o Nijamuddin & Ors. passed on 11.05.2026 and it was specifically prohibited that those who were fence-sitters and remained indolent and failed to agitate their rights within reasonable time, shall not be entitled to claim benefit of judgment in the case of Yasmeen Bee D/o Nijamuddin & ors.. Para 18 of the aforesaid judgment is being reproduced hereunder:- "18. However, the benefit of this judgment shall remain confined only to the petitioners before this Court and to those candidates, who had already approached this Court and whose writ petitions are pending consideration. Any fence-sitter who remained indolent and failed to agitate his rights within reasonable time shall not be entitled to claim benefit on the basis of the present judgment." 4. In view of above, this Court does not find any scope of interference in the present writ petition, and the same is hereby, dismissed. 5. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J 22/NEERU