Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8354 (KAR)

SRI P O VIJAY REDDY @ VIJAYAKUMAR REDDY v. THE COMMISSIONER

WP/5247/2026 · 2026-02-19

Suraj Govindaraj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10306 WP No. 5247 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 5247 OF 2026 (LB) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. P O VIJAY REDDY @ VIJAYAKUMAR REDDY AGED 63 YEARS S/O OBAREDDY R/A NO. 1277, A BLOCK, VIEJINAPUARA, DHOORAVANI NAGAR, BANGALORE …PETITIONER (BY SRI. DILIPKUMARGOWDA R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER MYSURU URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 4 MYSURU, KARNATAKA - 570023 2. THE DIRECTOR TOWN PLANNING AUTHORITY MYSURU URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MYSURU, KARNATAKA 570023 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SPOORTHI V., HCGP) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-DIRECT THE R1 ANS 2 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 29.01.2026 VIDE ANNX-E SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW AND ETC. Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10306 WP No. 5247 of 2026 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. Petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a. Issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writs or orders or directing the Respondent No.1 and 2 to consider the representation dated 29.01.2026, vide Annexure-E submitted by the petitioner in accordance with law; b. Grant such other and further relief as this Hon'ble Court deems fit to grant under the circumstances of the case in the interest of justice and equity. 2. A memo dated 19.02.2026 has been filed signed by the counsel for the petitioners, which reads as under: "It is submitted that certain facts are to be corrected in the instant petition, therefore the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to file fresh petition in the interest of justice and equity." 3. Accepting said memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, reserving liberty to file a fresh petition. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE GJM List No.: 2 Sl No.: 27 CT- RCK