Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8350 (GAU)

RAHIMA BEGUM v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS

WP(C)/1078/2026 · 2026-06-16

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010032202026 2026:GAU-AS:8731 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1078/2026 RAHIMA BEGUM W/O LATE HARIS ALI, R/O VILLAGE- GHULCHERRA, P.O.- GHULCHERRA, DISTRICT- SRIBHUMI, ASSAM, PIN- 788720 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, PENSION, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6 2:THE DIRECTOR OF PENSION ASSAM HOUSEFED COMPLEX DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 3:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 4:THE TREASURY OFFICER RAMKRISHNA NAGAR SUB-TREASURY RAMKIRSHNA NAGAR P.O.- RAMKRISHNA NAGAR DIST- SRIBHUMI ASSAM PIN-788166 5:THE SENIOR BRANCH MANAGER Page No.# 2/4 PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK NILAMBAZAR BRANCH DISTRICT- SRIBHUMI ASSAM PIN-78872 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N HAQUE, MR K UDDIN,MR. A K AZAD Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, FINANCE,SC, TREASURY,SC, PNB BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 17.06.2026 Heard Mr. K. Uddin, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. By filing this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a direction to the respondent authorities to revalidate and release the family pension, along with the arrear pension, payable in respect of her deceased husband, Late Haris Ali. 3. The petitioner is the wife of Late Haris Ali, who was serving as a Chowkidar in Gulcherra M.E. Madrassa, Sribhumi District, Assam. The petitioner's husband had died in harness on 23.11.2000, leaving behind the petitioner, a son and a daughter as his legal heirs. On the demise of her deceased husband, the petitioner was granted family pension with effect from 24.11.2000. However, since November, 2019, the family pension has not been credited to her account as she could not submit life certificate due to her illness during the Covid-19 pandemic. The petitioner had also lost the PPO book and on application, a duplicate PPO book was issued to her on 13.10.2023. Page No.# 3/4 4. Mr. K. Uddin, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner had submitted an application on 06.04.2023 before the respondent authorities praying for reopening of her pension account. Pursuant thereto, the Treasury Officer, Ramkrishna Nagar Sub-Treasury, Sribhumi, by communication dated 07.08.2024, informed the Branch Manager, Punjab National Bank, that pension remaining undrawn for more than 3 (three) years is required to be sent back to the sanctioning authority, i.e., the Director of Pension, through the concerned Treasury for revalidation. He submits that all the relevant documents have been thereafter forwarded to the respondent Bank. 5. Mr. A. Chaliha, learned Standing Counsel, Finance Department, submits that the Treasury Officer, Ramkrishna Nagar Sub-Treasury, Sribhumi, has already completed the process of revalidation and forwarded all relevant records to the respondent Bank. Therefore, there would not be any impediments to release the family pension to the petitioner. 6. Mr. A. Parwez, learned Standing Counsel for the Punjab National Bank, submits that the respondent Bank has received the revalidated pension papers along with all relevant documents in respect of the petitioner for payment of family pension. However, in view of certain procedure requirement, an approval is required from the Centralized Pension Processing Centre (CPPC), Kolkata. He submits that the said approval is expected to be received within 10 (ten) days. 7. Having considered the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and taking note of the fact that the family pension has already been Page No.# 4/4 revalidated by the competent authority and the relevant documents have been forwarded to the respondent Bank as well as considering the submission of the learned Standing Counsel for the Bank that only approval from the CPPC, Kolkata remains to be obtained, this Court is of the view that no further adjudication is required in the present proceedings. 8. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed with an observation that the respondent Bank, particularly respondent No. 5, shall expedite the process of obtaining the requisite approval from the CPPC, Kolkata and upon receipt thereof, release the family pension along with the admissible arrears to the petitioner without any avoidable delay. 9. Writ petition stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant