IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13988 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-301 Year-2025 Thana- SUPPI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Dharmukh Kumar @ Gharmukh Kumar S/O Yogi Rai Resident of Village- Jamala, Ward No. 1, P.S.- Suppi, District- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ritesh Kumar Narain Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Parmanand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 2 12-03-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Suppi P.S. Case no.301 of 2025 registered under sections 310(4) and 310(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and sections 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, on a search being conducted, four accused persons were caught and from the possession of the petitioner, a loaded country made pistol was recovered. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no incriminating article has been recovered from the petitioner’s possession who is in custody since 19.10.2025 and chargesheet has been submitted in the case. The cause of his false Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13988 of 2026(2) dt.12-03-2026 2/2 implication is his antecedent. 5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations in the FIR, the petitioner having remained in custody for more than 4 months since 19.10.2025 and chargesheet having been submitted in the case, the Court directs the petitioner to be enlarged on bail in connection with Suppi P.S. Case no.301 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi on the following condition: (i) If in course of investigation, it transpires that the petitioner had an antecedent under the Arms Act, the prosecution will be at liberty to move this Court for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. Saurabh/- (Partha Sarthy, J) U T