Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8345 (JHR)

ANUJ DANGI ALIAS ABHISHEK KUMAR VERMA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./813/2026 · 2026-02-26

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[ 2026:JHHC:5826 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 813 of 2026 Anuj Dangi @ Abhishek Kumar Verma, aged about 31 years, Son of Musafir Dangi, Resident of Village Gidhour, P.O. & P.S.- Gidhour, Dist. Chatra. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Md. Sajid Yunus, Adv. For the State : Mr. V.K.Vashistha, Spl. PP 02 / 26.02.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with NDPS case no. 67 of 2025 arising out of Lohsinghna P. S. case no. 183 of 2020 instituted under Section 21(b) (c )/ 22 (b) (c) of NDPS Act. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the police seized Heroine (brown sugar) from the possessions of the co-accused Shiv Shakti Rana who disclosed that he got brown sugar from Kishore Dangi and Anuj Dangi. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the seized brown sugar is less than the commercial quantity. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 07.10.2025, as mentioned in para 15 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co- operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case, hence, the petitioner may be admitted to regular bail. Learned Spl. P.P. opposed the prayer for regular bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-X, Hazaribagh in connection with NDPS case no. 67 of 2025 arising out of Lohsinghna P. S. case no. 183 of 2020 with the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Dated 26.02.2026 Smita/-