34 jdt. 26.02.2026 jb. WPA 3107 of 2026 (Ruby Gupta vs. State of West Bengal & Ors.) Mr. Sourav Sengupta Mr. Subhamoy Bhattacharjee Sk. Mrinal …. For the Petitioner Mr. Sujoy Mondal Nafisa Begum …. For the State Mr. Kumarjit Das Mr. Supriyo Ghosh Ms. Susmita Adhikary …. For the Respondent nos. 7 and 8 Affidavit of service filed by the petitioner is taken on record. The petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that the complaint lodged by him against the private respondents has not been acted upon. Upon consideration of the submission made on behalf of the parties, this Court is of the view that there is a dispute between them with regard to the title and possession of their respective shares in the property. A partition suit is also pending. In view of the fact that the complaint lodged by the petitioner has not been taken care of by the police authority, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the jurisdictional Magistrate under Section 175 of the BNSS for redressal of his grievance. In the meantime, the police authority shall keep strict vigil in the area in order to avoid any untoward incident in view of the strained relationship between the parties and shall ensure maintenance of peace and tranquility. 2 The writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Since no affidavit has been invited, allegations contained in the writ petition shall be deemed not to have been admitted. Urgent certified website copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties on compliance of requisite formalities. (Suvra Ghosh, J.)