Alageswaran v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Puthanatham
CRL OP(MD)/1485/2026 · 2026-01-28
S Srimathy
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 83440 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 83440 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP(MD). No.1485 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 28/01/2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY CRL OP(MD). No.1485 of 2026 Alageswaran ... Petitioner/Accused
Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by, The Inspector of Police, Puthanatham Police Station, Trichy District. Crime No.244/2025. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.T.Leninkumar, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No. 244 of 2025 on the file of the respondent Police. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD). No.1485 of 2026
ORDER : The Court made the following order :-
The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 11.08.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 310(2), 333, 127(7), 311, 351(3) and 332(b) of BNS, 2023. Subsequently altered into Sections 310(2), 325, 61(2), 127(7), 311, 351(3) and 332(b) of BNS, 2023, in Crime No.244 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
2. The prosecution case is that on 06.08.2025 at about 10.45 p.m., five unknown persons barged into the defacto complainant’s house and robbed 9½ sovereigns of gold jewels and cash of Rs.1,00,000/-. Hence, the complaint.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that A-4 has already been released on bail and that the petitioner is in judicial custody from
11.08.2025. Hence, he seeks bail to the petitioner. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD). No.1485 of 2026
4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that this is the third bail application and that the petitioner and other accused entered into the defacto complainant’s house and robbed 9½ sovereigns of gold jewels and cash of Rs.1,00,000/-. Therefore, he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner.
5. The allegation against the petitioner is that he poisoned the dog and committed robbery. Considering the nature of the offence, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed.
(S S Y J) 28.01.2026 jbr 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD). No.1485 of 2026 S.SRIMATHY,J jbr TO
1. The Inspector of Police, Puthanatham Police Station, Trichy District.
2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.1485 of 2026 Date : 28/01/2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis