HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 1787 of 2022 Court No. - 34 (SN.20) HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1.The instant petition has been filed with the following prayers: "i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari to quash the impugned office order dated 29.12.2016 passed by Respondent No. 1 and impugned office Order dated 05.01.2017 passed by Respondent No. 2 (Annexure No. 8 & 9 to the Writ Petition respectively) with all of its consequential effects whatsoever throughout. ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Respondents to not to oust the petitioners from their post after attending 62 years of age in pursuance to impugned office orders dated 29.12.2016 and 05.01.2017 passed by Respondent No. 1 & 2 respectively." 2. Vide order dated 29.12.2016, the representation of the petitioner was rejected in the light of the Government Order dated 23.10.2008, which provided that with regard to the contractual appointment of the Technical Assistants, the upper age limit of such contract is 62 years. At the time of the instant petition so filed by the petitioners, the petitioner claim that he was aged about 60 in his affidavit. Thus, at present, the petitioner must be more than 64 years. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gunjan Sharma, Namit Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Sharda Prasad And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) 3. In such view of the matter, the instant petition has become infructuous, according, the same is dismissed. September 24, 2026 Shubham Arya WRIA No. 1787 of 2022 2 (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHUBHAM ARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad