SMT.NANDINI v. SMFG INDIA HOME FINANCE COMPANY LTD.,
WP/32067/2025 · 2026-02-12
Ashok S Kinagi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8340 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8340 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8882 WP No. 32067 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 32067 OF 2025 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. NANDINI W/O VENKATESH MURTHY AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS NO. 1036, AYYAPPA NAGAR, NEAR SOUDAHAMINI KALYANA MANTAPA, DODDAKALLASANDRA, BENGALURU 560 062.
2.
MR. VENKATESH MURTHY G.R NO.120, 1ST BLOCK, 4TH CROSS, VISHWAPRIYA LAYOUT, BEGUR, BENGALURU -560062 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SUNIL K.N., ADVOCATE) AND:
SMFG INDIA HOME FINANCE COMPANY LTD., A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT,
Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8882 WP No. 32067 of 2025
REGISTERED OFFICE AT 3RD FLOOR, NO.165 MEGH TOWERS, PH ROAD, MADURAVOYAL, CHENNAI 600 095.
AND CORPORATE OFFICE AT, FLOOR 5 AND 6, B WIND SUPREME BUSINESS PARK, SUPREME CITY, POWAI, MUMBAI- 400076,
HAVING ITS BRANCH OFFICE AT, NO.21, 3RD FLOOR, RAJA GLITZ, K.H.ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 027.
REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER LEGAL MANAGER MR. KEERTHINATHA …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SURESH V., ADVOCATE FOR R1 SRI. RAJENDRA PRASAD FOR C/R IN CP No.2333/2025)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS FROM RESPONDENTS. A) QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER LEARNED IX ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE AT BENGALURU CITY IN CRL. MISC NO.
6727/2025 DATED 10/10/2025 VIDE ANNEXURE E IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. B) ALLOW THIS WRIT PETITION WITH COST.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8882 WP No. 32067 of 2025
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
ORAL ORDER
1. The petitioner has filed a Memo for withdrawal of the writ petition. It is stated that the petitioner has instructed the learned counsel to withdraw/not press the petition.
2. The Memo is placed on record.
3. The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE
RK CT:KHV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 6