SUKHDEEP SINGH ALIAS SONU v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
CRM-M/61720/2025 · 2026-02-17
Subhas Mehla
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 834 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 834 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Decided on: 17.02.2026
…...Petitioner Versus
…...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present:
**** SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (Oral) ! "# $
%& ' () "* %& % # &&
&+
+"
+#
+,)-
#.% /
0 1 / %+/ 2 2 3 )-
/ / '
4
" %%"567&8/ 9 4 / / : SONIA PURI 2026.02.18 17:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
-2- %+
2 +"
&+&&)-
#.%
/
/ / & !
()/ 2
; / + <
-
() ' %+
'
/ /
" 0 2
-4) '/
/ 2
/ . )
- 3 ) -
/ /
/ / 2
7.
Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and for respondent No.2 are ad idem that in view of the settlement effected between the parties, the present petition deserves to be accepted. It has also come on record that the aforesaid compromise is genuine and the parties effected the same without any undue influence or coercion. 8. In view of above, nothing remains to be adjudicated further SONIA PURI 2026.02.18 17:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
-3- in the present case. Thus, continuation of the criminal proceedings between the parties would be a futile exercise and sheer wastage of time of the Court and thus, amounts to abuse of process of law. , ( 7 / / 2 => 6 -
(3$ -!"
#
$ %
/() "* %& % # &&
&+
+"
+#
+, )-
#.% /
01 / %+/ 2 2 3 ) -
/ / '
are hereby quashed qua the petitioner,2 %
%%%47
/ ) - 2
&"*# "%&"
)(- -7 -$)%#%+
- $;)
7 *7$
- % -) / *%&%.
(SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE 17.02.2026 Sonia Puri
Whether Speaking/Reasoned: YES/NO
Whether Reportable:
YES/NO SONIA PURI 2026.02.18 17:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document