AYUSHI SHARMA D/O SATISH KUMAR SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/9759/2026 · 2026-05-27
Anand Sharma V J
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8337 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8337 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:22662] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9759/2026
1. Ayushi Sharma D/o Satish Kumar Sharma, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Ashok Nagar, Sector-I, District Dausa, Rajasthan.
2. Maya Ram Meena D/o Shyam Lal Meena, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Rajputo Ka Mohalla, Shri Ram Nagar, District Kota, Rajasthan.
3. Nisha Shama D/o Ramavatar Sharma, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Village And Post, Tehla, District Alwar, Rajasthan.
4. Govind Singh Jaipal S/o Narayan Singh Jaipal, Aged About 26 Years, R/o 255, Jaipalo Ka Bas, Dingai, Post Dingai, District Pali, Rajasthan.
5. Sumit Verma S/o Randhir Singh Verma, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Sector No.6, Ward No.51, Suresiya, District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.
6. Bharat Kumar Meghwal S/o Vikram Kumar, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Meghwalo Ka Bas, Anoppora, Tehsil Sumerpur, District Pali, Rajasthan.
7. Prem Paliwal S/o Ashok Kumar, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Paliwalo Ka Was, Ward No.6, Pachpadra, District Balotra, Rajasthan.
8. Hukma Ram S/o Goma Ram, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Nosar Chak, Kasumbliya, Nosar, Tehsil Baytu, District Balotra, Rajasthan.
9. Vivek Goyal S/o Rupa Ram Goyal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village And Post Dholiya, Tehsil Ladnun, Didwana Kuchman, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Sanskrit Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Commissioner, Commissionerate Of Sanskrit Education, Block No. 6, Second Floor, Dr. Radhakrishan Shiksha Sankul, Jln Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
3. Principal Secretary, Department Of Secondary Education,
[2026:RJ-JP:22662] (2 of 3) [CW-9759/2026] Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
4. Director, Directorate Of Secondary Education, District Bikaner, Rajasthan.
5. Secretary, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, State Institute Of Agriculture Management Premises, Shreeji Nagar, Prithviraj Colony, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302018, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harendar Neel For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 27/05/2026
1. It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioners that after participating in recruitment process initiated by Rajasthan Staff Selection Board for the post of Librarian Gr.-III although the petitioners have been selected, yet only on account of the fact that veracity of degrees of certain candidates is in question for which inquiry has been conducted by Special Operations Group (SOG), appointment has not been granted to the petitioners, nor have the respondents disclosed any other reason relating to eligibility and entitlement of the petitioners.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have although submitted repeated representations before the Director, Secondary Education Rajasthan, Bikaner, yet such representations have not been addressed qua the Competent Authority.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners also submits that the petitioners would be satisfied, in case, liberty is granted to the
[2026:RJ-JP:22662] (3 of 3) [CW-9759/2026] petitioners to file their individual representations before the Competent Authority which may be decided in a time bound manner for disclosing the reasons for not issuing appointment orders in respect of the petitioners.
4. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of the present writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to file their individual representation along with their qualification documents before the Secretary, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Jaipur as well as the Director, Secondary Education Rajasthan, Bikaner, and the Competent Authority shall objectively considered the representations and pass a speaking order strictly in accordance with law within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of representation along with a certified copy of this order.
5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of.
6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of this case.
7. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of.
(ANAND SHARMA),J 534(s)/DAKSH