- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15452 CRL.P No. 8925 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 8925 OF 2018 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. MAILARAPPA D.K. S/O KAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, 2. SMT. RADHAMMA W/O MAILARAPPA D.K AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, BOTH ARE R/AT SCOUT CAMP ROAD 3RD STATION, APPAREL PARK DODDABALLAPURA TOWN BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-561203 3. SMT. L. SHARADAMMA W/O LATE B.H. HANUMANTHARAJU AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, RESIDING AT HAROHALLI VILLAGE SASALU HOBLI DODDABALLAPURA TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-561203 4. SMT. L. PARVATHI DEVI AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, S/O R.H. KANADE RESIDING AT NO.1421 12TH B CROSS, 2ND STAGE WEST OF CHORD ROAD MAHALAKSHMIPURAM BANGALORE CITY-560086 …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. DAYAMANI S., ADVOCATE FOR PETITIONER NOS.3 AND 4; SRI. S. RAJASHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR PETITIONER NOS.1 AND 2) Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15452 CRL.P No. 8925 of 2018 AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY HOSAHALLI POLICE DODDABALLAPURA-561203 REPRESENTED BY SPP HIGH COURT BUILDING, BANGALORE. 2. SRI. THIMMAIAH S/O LATE GOVINDAIAH AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/A BETTADA SEETHADAKALLU VILLAGE URDIGERE HOBLI, TUMKUR TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT-572102 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MOHD. AYUB ALI, ADDL. SPP FOR RESPONDENT NO.1; SRI. B.S.MURALI, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.2) THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS PENDING BEFORE THE CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., DODDABALLAPURA, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT INITIATED IN C.C.NO.670/2018 ARISING OUT OF PCR NO.269/2017, FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 468, 471, 323, 504 AND 506 OF IPC, ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15452 CRL.P No. 8925 of 2018 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time, filed a memo to withdraw the petition. 2. The memo is taken on record 3. In view of the memo, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 3. It is open for the petitioner to file an appropriate application seeking discharge, in which event, the trial Court shall decide the application on merits and in accordance with law. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE UN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3