Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8336 (PAT)

Kaju Yadav @ Kaju Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./21707/2026 · 2026-04-07

Sandeep Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21707 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-361 Year-2025 Thana- RAJAON District- Banka ====================================================== Kaju Yadav @ Kaju Kumar Yadav S/O Arvind Yadav @ Arbind Yadav Resident of Chhoti Ghutiya Shyampur. P.S.- Rajoun, Dist.- Banka. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dhananjay Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Binod Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 07-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Rajoun P.S. Case No. 361 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 352, 351(2), 308, 3(5) of the BNS and under Section 27 of the Arms Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is accused of demanding extortion (rangdari) of Rs. 50,000/-. 4. The petitioner is in custody since 21.11.2025 and he is accused in 31 more cases. 5. Considering the facts of the case and the criminal antecedent of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21707 of 2026(2) dt.07-04-2026 2/2 7. It is, however, clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. Vikas/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U