Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 83340 (MAD)

K.Vijayakumar v. The District Collector

WP(MD)/446/2026 · 2026-01-08

G Jayachandran, K K Ramakrishnan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(MD) No.446 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 08.01.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN W.P.(MD) No.446 of 2026 and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.417 & 418 of 2026 Vijayakumar ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The District Collector Ramanathapuram District 2.The Tahsildar Paramakudi Ramanathapuram District ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the entire records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent in Na.Ka.A3/3680/2025 dated 23.12.2025 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent not to interfere into petitioner peaceful possession and enjoyment of his properties described in the said notice. ____________ p. 2 W.P.(MD) No.446 of 2026 For Petitioner : Mr.S.Vikraman For Respondents : Mr.D.Sasi Kumar Additional Government Pleader O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.] The impugned notice dated 23.12.2025, issued by the Tahsildar, does not appear to be vitiated by any infirmity. A portion measuring 0.00.63 square meter has been identified as encroachment and accordingly, the impugned notice has been issued to the petitioner, under Section 7 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905, to show cause as to why the encroachment made by him in the subject land should not be removed. If the petitioner is in anyway aggrieved with regard to the measurement of the land and other things, he has to work out his remedy before the authority concerned in accordance with law and the writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is not maintainable. ____________ p. 3 W.P.(MD) No.446 of 2026 2. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. [G.J., J.] [K.K.R.K., J.] 08.01.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No krk To: 1.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District. 2.The Tahsildar, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District. ____________ p. 4 W.P.(MD) No.446 of 2026 DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J. AND K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J. krk W.P.(MD) No.446 of 2026 and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.417 & 418 of 2026 08.01.2026 ____________