7. 26-02-2026 (ct. no.34) debajyoti IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction CRR 81 of 2026 Shamit Bhattacharyya Vs. Madhura Bhattacharyya Mr. Pinak Kumar Mitra, Adv., Ms. Sudarshana Srivastava, Adv. … For the Petitioner. 1. The matter has come at the instance of the learned advocate for the petitioner for correction of some typographical errors crept in the order dated January 29, 2026. 2. In the third line of the second paragraph of the said order, the word ‘complaint’ shall be read as “FIR” and in the fourth line of the same paragraph, the word ‘petitioner’ shall be read as “opposite party”. In the last line of paragraph 5, the word ‘is’ shall be read as “if”. 3. Let these corrections be incorporated in the order dated January 29, 2026 by the concerned department and shall form part of the said order. 4. All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. 5. Criminal Section is directed to supply certified copies of this order to the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of all necessary formalities. [Chaitali Chatterjee (Das), J.]