Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8329 (UTT)

VISHAL KUMAR v. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE HARIDWAR

CLCON/350/2026 · 2026-07-20

Pankaj Purohit

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010105332026 2026:UHC:6032 SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS CLCON No.350 of 2026 Vishal Kumar ………Petitioner Vs. District Magistrate, Haridwar ………Respondent Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Akshay Pradhan, learned counsel for the petitioner, through video conferencing. 2. Today the matter is listed on a Withdrawal Application (IA No.1 of 2026). 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order dated 04.11.2025, passed in WPMS No.3068 of 2025, Vishal Kumar Vs. State of Uttarakhand and another, has now been complied with rendering the present contempt petition as infructuous. 4. Permission for withdrawal is granted. 5. Accordingly withdrawal application is allowed. 6. Contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn as being infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 20.07.2026 SK