[2026:RJ-JP:21378] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 750/2026 1. Upasana Bhaskar D/o Sh. Rajeev Kumar, W/o Sh. Kanhaiya Prajapat, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Kachroli District Karauli (Raj.) 322230 At Present R/o Medi Ka Pura, Kachroli, District Karauli (Raj.) 2. Kanhaiya Prajapat S/o Sh. Netram Prajapat, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Medi Ka Pura, Kachroli, District Karauli (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs Govt. Secretariat Jaipur. 2. The Superintendent Of Police Cum Nodal Officer, Special Investigation Unit Crime Against Women Cell, Karauli District Karauli (Raj.). 3. The Station House Officer Police Station, Sadar Kachroli, District Karauli (Raj.) 4. Rajeev Kumar, S/o Sh. Ummedi Lal, R/o Kachroli District Karauli (Raj.) 322230 5. Smt. Seema W/o Sh. Rajeev Kumar, R/o Kachroli District Karauli (Raj.) 6. Narendra Kumar S/o Sh. Ummedi Lal, R/o Kachroli District Karauli (Raj.) 7. Yaduraj Bhaskar S/o Sh. Ummedi Lal, R/o Kachroli District Karauli (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S. K. Lamba, Adv. Mr. Abhijeet Prajapati, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 20/05/2026 [2026:RJ-JP:21378] (2 of 3) [CRLW-750/2026] 1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled. 2. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.4 to 7 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are major to take decision of their life. He submits that petitioners solemnized their marriage on 05.05.2026 at Arya Samaj Moti Katala, Jaipur and same has been registered before the Marriage Registration Officer, Kishanpole Zone, Jaipur. A copy of the petitioners’ marriage registration certificate has been annexed with the petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos. 4 to 7 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they have prayed for protection. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has placed reliance upon the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the same. 6. Both the petitioners are present in person today in the court. Their signature have been obtained on the court’s order sheet and they have been duly identified by their counsel. 7. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners are directed to file an appropriate application seeking protection before the concerned SHO, who in turn, is directed that if such an application is filed before him, he will [2026:RJ-JP:21378] (3 of 3) [CRLW-750/2026] provide adequate protection to the petitioners as per law and ensure that no harm is caused to them. 8. The Criminal Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 9. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 10. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect other civil/ criminal proceedings, if any pending in the present matter. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J Gourav/227