[2026:RJ-JP:22443] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7437/2026 1. Laturlal S/o Lt. Ghansilal, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Roteda, P.s Kapren, Dist. Bundi Presently At Kalyanpura Ward No. 1 Kapren, P.s. Kapren, Bundi. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail K Patan). 2. Surendra S/o Sohanlal, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Roteda, P.s K Patan Dist. Bundi. (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail K Patan). 3. Sohan Lal S/o Lt Ghansilal, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Roteda, P.s K Patan Dist. Bundi. (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail K Patan). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Dadhich For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP Mr. Pawan Verma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 26/05/2026 1. The petitioners has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.54/2026 registered at Police Station Kapren, District Bundi for offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 333, 351(3) and 3(5) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the complainant as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He again submits that the allegation levelled against the present petitioners is for inflicting injuries to the injured Satyanarain and Mahaveer but no injury has been opined to be dangerous to life. He further contends that a compromise has been arrived at between the [2026:RJ-JP:22443] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7437/2026] petitioners and the injured/complainant and the dispute has been amicably settled. Petitioners are behind the bars since 30.04.2026 without any criminal past. Charge-sheet has already been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, consequently the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. Learned counsel for the complainant admits the factum of compromise between the parties and raises no objection if the bail application of the petitioner be allowed. 6. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 7. Consequently, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is directed that the petitioners Laturlal S/o Lt. Ghansilal, Surendra S/o Sohanlal and Sohan Lal S/o Lt Ghansilal, be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that each of them shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/78