AKSHAY @ AKSHAYA NAYAK @ AKSHYA KUMAR NAYAK v. STATE OF ODISHA
ABLAPL/4324/2026 · 2026-05-02
V Narasingh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8323 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8323 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No.4324 of 2026
Akshay @ Akshaya Nayak @ Akshya Kumar Nayak
….
Petitioner
Mr. S. N. Mishra 4, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. M. R. Mohanty, AGA
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
Order No.
ORDER 02.05.2026
01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and
learned counsel for the State.
2. The Petitioner is seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with C.T. Case No.471 of 2026 pending on the file of learned J.M.F.C., Soro, arising out of Simulia P.S. Case No.102 of 2026, for commission of offences punishable under Sections 126(2)/118(1)/118(2)/109(1)/296 of BNS, 2023.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel that because of counter case, exaggerated allegations have been made. Hence, the Petitioner may be protected by pre-arrest bail.
4.
Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for pre-arrest bail referring to the injury report and submits that though the injury is simple, the
same being on the vital part of the head. Hence, no leniency ought to be shown.
5. Considering the nature of allegations, the background in which the same has been made and the nature of the injury, it is directed that on surrendering within three weeks hence and moving for bail, the Petitioner shall be released on bail by the learned Court in seisin on such terms as deemed just and proper subject to verification of criminal antecedent of similar nature.
6. If it comes to the fore that the Petitioner has any such criminal antecedent, this order shall not be given effect to.
7. It is needless to state that the Petitioner shall cooperate with the ongoing investigation.
8. The ABLAPL is accordingly disposed of.
(V. NARASINGH)
Judge
Sumitra