IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 6143 of 2026 Decided on: 14.05.2026 Sudershan Kumar …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Virender Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Assistant Advocate General for respondent-State. : Ms. Komal Chaudhary, Advocate for respondent No. 3. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Rajat Chauhan, learned Assistant Advocate General, and Ms. Komal Chaudhary, learned Counsel, accept notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 and 2 and respondent No. 3, respectively. 2. As prayed for, this petition is disposed of with the direction that representation (Annexure P-4) filed by the petitioner be decided by the Competent Authority within a period of twelve weeks from today in terms of the contents therein as well as by taking into consideration judgment dated 06.04.2026, passed by this Court in CWP No.9321 of 2025, titled Vijay Parmar and others versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge May 14, 2026 (narender) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?