HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 2899 of 2026 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. The list of fresh cases has been revised. None is present on behalf of the petitioners. Learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent nos. 1 and 2 and Sri B.S. Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Sri Kartikey Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent no.3 is present. The present writ petition arises out of the order dated 16.10.2025 passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation in Case No. 0988 of 2023, by means of which the application for amendment filed by respondent no. 3 was allowed and the subsequent order dated 05.02.2026, by means of which the application for recall of the order dated 16.10.2025 filed by the petitioner was rejected. It is contended by the learned counsel for respondent no. 3 that the Case No. 0988 of 2023, in which the impugned orders dated 16.10.2025 and 05.02.2026 have been passed has now been finally decided on 24.08.2026. Hence, the present writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous. September 23, 2026 Gaurav Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shashi Bhushan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Kartikey Pandey (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) Ram Nevas And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 20 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad