Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8316 (CHH)

TARJAN GUPTA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/13553/2025 · 2026-02-24

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 3 2026:CGHC:9875 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 13553 of 2025 1. Tarjan Gupta S/o Ajodhya Gupta Aged About 39 Years Working As Rural Health Organizer (Male) At Sub-Health Center, Nalpavand Jagdalpur, District Bastar C.G. 2. Harish Chandra Jaiswal S/o Guljari Lal Jaiswal Aged About 38 Years Working As Rural Health Organizer (Male) At Sub-Health Center, Dongri-Guda, District Kondagaon C.G. 3. Santlal Sahu S/o Amru Ram Aged About 40 Years Working As Rural Health Organizer (Male) At Ayushman Arogya Mandir, Temri, District Raipur C.G. 4. Praveen Dhidwanshi S/o Sonsai Aged About 40 Years Working As Rural Health Organizer (Male) At Sub-Health Center, Tulsi (Dharsiwan), District Raipur C.G. 5. Mirza Kasim Beg S/o Mirza Ismail Aged About 45 Years Working As Rural Health Organizer (Male) At Ayushman Arogya Mandir, Uslapur District Bilaspur C.G. 6. Suresh Kumar Patel S/o Shri Reshamlal Patel Aged About 36 Years Working As Rural Health Organizer (Male) At Sub-Health Center, Gohrapali, District Mahasamund C.G. 7. Saroj Baghmar S/o R.N. Baghmar Aged About 54 Years Working As Rural Health Organizer (Male) At Sub-Health Center, Kasdol, District Balodabazar C.G. 8. Dev Kumar Padoti S/o Santosh Kumar Aged About 36 Years Working As Rural Health Organizer (Male) At Sub-Health Center, Kukada, Chhura, District Gariyaband C.G. 9. Praveen Ratre S/o Dilip Singh Aged About 34 Years Working As Rural Health Organizer (Male) At Sub-Health Center, Rishali (Bhilai), District Durg C.G. 10.Aditya Sharma S/o Nilambar Sharma Aged About 34 Years Working As Rural Health Organizer (Male) At Sub-Health Center, Gopalpur, District Surajpur C.G. 11. Drupadraj Sethiya S/o Jaidev Sethia Aged About 36 Years Working As Rural Health Organizer (Male) At Sub-Health Center, Badebanjoda, District Kondagaon C.G. 12.Gajendra Bhosle S/o Raghwendra Bhosle Aged About 38 Years Working As Rural Health Organizer (Male) At Sub-Health Center, Singhansara, District Sakti C.G. ... Petitioner PAWAN KUMAR JHA Digitally signed by PAWAN KUMAR JHA 2 / 3 versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Health And Family Welfare Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur C.G. 2. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Finance Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur C.G. 3. Upper Secretary, Health And Family Welfare Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur C.G. 4. Director, Health Services, Indrawati Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur C.G. ... Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Ravikar Patel, Advocate For Respondent-State : Mr. Khulesh Sahu, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 25/02/2026 1. Petitioners have filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs. “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call all the record of this case for the pertaining of the Hon'ble Court. 10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set-aside/quashed the order dated 04.08.2010 of Sr. 216/C-2802/10/Finance/Rule/four (Finance Direction 32/2010) and Order Dated. 08.08.2018 Sr. 401/L 2018-71-00727/Finance/Rule/four (Finance Direction 43/2018). That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities for consideration the Rs. 2400/- grade pay and level 7 for the petitioners. 10.4 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to fix the grade pay and Time Scale Pay discrepancy of the petitioners. 10.5 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief as it may deems fit and appropriate. 2. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that there is disparity of pay in between Rural Health Organizer and the Technicians working in the Medical and Health Department, against which petitioners have submitted 3 / 3 representation. He however, submits that at this stage he is not pressing this writ petition on merits and only seeking permission of this Court to submit fresh comprehensive representation before the respondents-authorities and further direction be issued to the concerned authorities to take decision on the representation to be submitted by petitioners at the earliest within specified time. 3. Learned State counsel submits that as the petitioners are seeking limited prayer of direction to respondents-authorities to consider and take decision on the claim/ representation of petitioners, he is having no objection. 4. On due consideration of the submission made by learned counsel for the respective parties, this writ petition is disposed of permitting the petitioners to submit fresh comprehensive representation along with supporting documents before competent authorities raising all the grounds as raised in this writ petition and if such a representation is submitted, concerned authority shall consider and take decision on the representation to be submitted by petitioners, in accordance with law, expeditiously preferably within a further period of 04 months from the date of receipt of representation. 5. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with aforesaid observations and directions. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) pwn JUDGE