Page 1 of 3. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No.12625 of 2026 Rasmita Sahoo ..... Petitioner Represented by Adv. - Prasanta Kumar Joshi -versus- state of Odisha & ors. ..... Opposite Parties Represented by Adv. – P.P. Behera, A.G.A. CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA ORDER 02.05.2026 Order No. 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode). 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner as well as learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State-Opposite Parties. Perused the writ application as well as the documents annexed thereto. 3. The Petitioner has filed the present writ application with the following prayer: “On the grounds above, it is therefore, most humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue rule Nisi to the Opposite Parties as to why direction shall not be issued to communicate the secured marks and answer sheet of the petitioner with respect to her main written examination for the post of TGT Arts for Leave Training Reserve Teachers (LTR) for Government Secondary Schools as provisioned in sub-clause (c) (ii) & Page 2 of 3. (e) of clause-11 of advertisement no. 4231 dt. 22.10.2024 at annexure-1 and as it is legal right of the Petitioner to know her marks in the Competitive Examination to compare with the Cut-off mark and to know why She has not been Selected though She was selected in the UR category under 'Own Merit' in Prelim Exam. And/ or pass such order/orders, direction/directions as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper for the end of Justice.” 4. In course of hearing of the writ application, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner ventilating her grievance has submitted representation before the Secretary, OSSC, Bhubaneswar, Opposite Party No.2 under Annexure-7. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that the said representation is pending as of now. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that a direction be issued to the Opposite Party No.2 to consider the representation of the Petitioner under Annexure-7 within a stipulated period of time. 5. Learned Additional Standing Counsel submits that he has no objection if the representation of the Petitioner is considered by the Opposite Party No.2, which is stated to be pending, in accordance with law within a stipulated period of time. 6. Considering the limited nature of grievance of the Petitioner, the writ application is disposed of at the stage of admission with a direction to the Opposite Party No.2 to consider the representation of the Petitioner under Annexure-7 within a period of four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. The Opposite Party No.2 shall do well to dispose of the representation of the Petitioner under Annexure-7 by passing a speaking and Page 3 of 3. reasoned order. The decision so taken by the Opposite Party No.2 be also communicated to the Petitioner within ten days thereafter. 7. With the aforesaid observation/ direction, the writ application stands disposed of. 8. Issue urgent certified copy of this order as per Rules. ( A.K. Mohapatra ) Judge Anil Designation: Junior Stenographer