Sreedhar Engineering Works v. Sri G. Sai Prasad, I.A.S.,
CC/359/2025 · 2026-08-17
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8313 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8313 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010063832025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE 18th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 359 OF 2025 Between:
1. Sreedhar Engineering Works, Rep-by Its Managing Partner A. Sridhar, S/o, Venkaiah aged about 47 years Occ- Contractor, R/o.K.R.Nagar, 1st lane, Padugupadu village, Kovur Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. ...Petitioner AND
1. Sri G Sai Prasad I A S, Principal Secretary, Irrigation and Command Area Development Department Secretariat Amaravathi, Guntur District.
2. Sri S Desi Nayak, Superintending Engineer Irrigation Circle, Nellore SPSR Nellore District.
3. Sri K Nagaraju, Executive Engineer, Nellore Central Division, Nellore SPSR Nellore District.
4. Sri Peeyush Kumar IAS, Principal Secretary Department of Finance and Planning Secretariat Amaravathi, Guntur District. ...Respondents Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondents under the Contempt
2
of Court Act for willful and deliberate disobedience of the orders of this Honourable Court in W.P.NO.10792 OF 2023 Dt. 11.12.2023 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: C SUBODH Counsel for the Respondents: SUSHMA YAGANTI The Court made the following order:
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 359 OF 2025
ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 11.12.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.10792 of 2023.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.
3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the respondents have complied with the orders dated 11.12.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.10792 of 2023 and furnished written instructions dated 14.08.2026 to that effect. Hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not refute the submission made by the learned counsel for the respondents.
5. Recording the said submissions, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 18.08.2026 BSP/TPS
4
16
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
(closed)
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 359 OF 2025
18.08.2026 BSP/TPS