Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8313 (ALL)

HARMEET SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/15423/2026 · 2026-09-22

Manju Rani Chauhan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15423 of 2026 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to delete respondent no.4 from the array of parties during the course of the day. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Shivendra Singh Bhadauria, learned counsel for respondent nos.2 & 3, and learned Standing Counsel for the State. The writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent nos.2 & 3 to transfer the petitioner from District Bahraich to District Moradabad within a short stipulated period. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent nos.2 & 3 to consider and decide the application of the petitioner dated 10.09.2026 within a short stipulated period." Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is suffering from cancer and his wife is posted as Assistant Teacher in District Moradabad, therefore, to take care of the petitioner, he requests that he may be transferred to District Moradabad. In this regard, an application has been moved before the respondent no.2, but nothing has been done. Therefore, a direction may be issued to the respondent no.2 to look into the grievance of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders within a stipulated period. Learned counsel for the respondent-BSA submits that if the petitioner submits a fresh, detailed representation before respondent Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Kumar Singh, Narsingh Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Harmeet Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) no.2, the same shall be considered and decided strictly in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that the petitioner may make a fresh, detailed application/representation, ventilating all his grievances, supported by such documents as he may be advised, before respondent no.2, Secretary, U.P. Basic Shiksha Parishad, Prayagraj, within one week from today along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being made, respondent no.2 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, sympathetically, in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after affording the petitioner a proper opportunity of hearing, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. September 23, 2026 Rahul. WRIA No. 15423 of 2026 2 (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAHUL GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad