Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8304 (GAU)

BAKUL DAS AND 2 ORS. v. SADHAN DAS AND 5 ORS.

FAO/37/2026 · 2026-06-16

Kaushik Goswami

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010120852026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : FAO/37/2026 BAKUL DAS AND 2 ORS. SON OF LATE HARMOHAN DAS, RESIDENT OF NALAPARA, SAWKUCHI, SAUKUCHI, KAMRUP (M), ASSAM 2: ABHIJIT DAS SON OF LATE HARMOHAN DAS RESIDENT OF NALAPARA SAWKUCHI SAUKUCHI KAMRUP (M) ASSAM 3: TUTU DAS SON OF LATE HARMOHAN DAS RESIDENT OF NALAPARA SAWKUCHI SAUKUCHI KAMRUP (M) ASSA VERSUS SADHAN DAS AND 5 ORS. SON OF LATE RATHINDRA KUMAR DAS, RESIDENT OF VAISALI HOUSING SOCIETY OF CO. OPERATIVE, FLAT NO. B-2, SANTIRAM DAS PATH, RIHABARI, GUWAHATI-08, DISTRICT-KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN- 781008. 2:SANJIT RAM PHUKAN SON OF LATE AMIYA RAM PHUKAN RESIDENT OF FLAT NO. D-2 MANDOVI APARTMENT AMBARI G.N.B. ROAD KAMRUP (M) Page No.# 2/3 GUWAHATI- 781001. 3:RANJIT RAM PHUKAN @ RANJIT PHUKAN SON OF LATE AMIYA RAM PHUKAN RESIDENT OF 4848 LOWREY ROAD DAKLAND C-94605 USA. REPRESENTED BY HIS ATTORNEY HOLDER SRI SANJIT RAM PHUKAN 4:SMTI. NIRUPAMA DAS WIFE OF BHABEN DAS RESIDENT OF BETKUCHI LOKHARA NEAR LOKHARA CHARIALI LOKHARA- REHABARI ROAD P.O.- SAWKUCHI GUWAHATI-40 DISTRICT- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM 5:ANUP KUMAR AGARWALA SON OF SRI MEGHRAJ AGARWALA R/O UNIQUE HEIGHTS RUKMINI NAGAR S.K. BARUAH ROAD DIST- KAMRUP (M) GUWAHATI ASSAM PIN- 781006 6:MANISH AGARWALA SON OF SRI MEGHRAJ AGARWALA R/O UNIQUE HEIGHTS RUKMINI NAGAR S.K. BARUAH ROAD DIST- KAMRUP (M) GUWAHATI ASSAM PIN- 78100 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B K SEN, N HASAN,MS. J PAUL,MS B MAHANTA Advocate for the Respondent : , Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER Date : 17.06.2026 Heard Mr. B. K. Sen, learned counsel appearing for the appellants. Upon the issue of maintainability of the present FAO being pointed out by the Court, learned counsel for the appellants seeks leave to withdraw the appeal with liberty to avail such remedy as may be available in law. The prayer is allowed. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the appellants to institute appropriate proceedings, if so advised and permissible in law. JUDGE Comparing Assistant